log in

slider only

approved

Name slider only
Short Description Restricts object choice to sliders only.
Long Description
Parent descriptor gimmick
Usable True
Proposer moonpoint
Type new
Creation date 2023-12-21 22:47:13
Last updated 2023-12-30 02:26:05
Status approved by moonpoint

Vote

87.5% voted positively


yes (21): moonpoint, Visionary, ayel, Blue Dragon, -Koish-, Leviathan, funny, Fsjallink, [[[[[[, wooper, semaphore, milr_, Boombox, crusire, fluxie31, MonsieurSebas, weed machine, Lulu-, Three Fairies, maxb
no (0):
hold (3): Happy Satoko, Evamare, Happyster


Comments (15)
Comments are disabled for proposals with an outcome.

moonpoint voted yes

now added! im going to skip the ceremony here and also create 'circle only', given the reception. i hope everyone forgives me for this grave misconduct

MonsieurSebas voted yes

it gets the point across regardless of whether it has the plural suffix or not, and Like circleless/no circle practically mean slider only so i dont see the point of trying to say the same thing 3 different ways when this one works fine

funny voted yes

slider only is betterd

-Koish- voted yes

I think sliders only sounds way better + I think we should include maps that have only sliders nd a couple of spinners under this descriptor.

moonpoint voted yes

yes voters: any more thoughts on "no circles" / "circeless" as suggested?

+1 on name change to no circles/circleless

Evamare voted hold

slider only /s/73706

milr_ voted yes

agree

Happy Satoko voted hold

yes but change to "sliders only" or "no circles"

maxb voted yes

2 people posting suggestions to change the descriptor but both of them voted yes instead of hold. Use the votes properly!!!!!

fluxie31 voted yes

Maybe "sliders only" (pluralized) because "slider only" kinda looks stupid im sorry :sob:

funny voted yes

thats kind of pedantic imo @dpeace and sounds less cool

Happyster voted hold

spinner only when

[[[[[[ voted yes

i feel like no circles would be a better name just to allow maps with only sliders and spinner

moonpoint voted yes

here's a self explanatory one. i'll create a "circle only" counterpart if this passes

omdb list: http://omdb.nyahh.net/list/?id=42

labs | discord | github | rules | descriptors | edit queue
0.02762508392334s