ok im done with this convo but @dsco i said the word legacy because semaphore was talking about judging maps based on them being groundbreaking. goddamn man
there are a few old maps that gain value based on when they were made though. like i like how BASARA being someone's first map in 2010 provides a view of a new mapper's experience being new to mapping in a time when mapping wasn't as developed and ideas weren't as widespread
i think a lot of this debate comes down to what you think the function of the charts actually is though. if you think it's to highlight the most important maps, then legacy will be important in deciding how you vote. for me, i think the charts are good for showing people good maps and bringing maps to light that might not otherwise get attention, so i don't think a map being good for its time should impact that, especially when there are maps from the same time that are still good today
"immediately discarding any map made before 2017 because 'this map isnt groundbreaking nowadays' is 0iq"
1. i never mentioned maps being groundbreaking nowadays at all. tbh i think rating a map highly because it's groundbreaking is really stupid for the exact reason you mentioned, being that community perception of what is novel changes over time
2. there are absolutely maps that are still good from before 2017. how is this "discarding maps made before 2017". if anything, considering maps based on how much you like them absent from mapping context is putting them on an equal playing field to new maps, not discarding them
high sv works better here than the previous map. hope he doesn't keep it up tho
whys the sv so high
he learned about sharp entry angles in the last map and he learned about spacing emphasis in this map
stream jumpscare
the first 7 seconds had me thinking he was moving forward but then i got sent back into no spacing emphasis land
man this aint my dad this is a CELL PHONE
last kiai slidershapes are actually pretty heat
02:04:878 (1,2,3,4) - he got bored
02:36:039 (1,2,3,4,5) - he snapped
https://twitter.com/squirrelpascals/status/1606455033515622401 okayyy i'll go play it again jeez
ok im done with this convo but @dsco i said the word legacy because semaphore was talking about judging maps based on them being groundbreaking. goddamn man
she doggin on my wood til i land
fucking heatt i love posy
industrial revolution of mapping
nebu gonna give u up
fun in the same way that music is fun
SAVAGE!! [2]
overhated
middly
thought there was a tempo change in this and then i checked and there wasnt and i dont think ive felt that before
big visual improvement from previous
there are a few old maps that gain value based on when they were made though. like i like how BASARA being someone's first map in 2010 provides a view of a new mapper's experience being new to mapping in a time when mapping wasn't as developed and ideas weren't as widespread
i think a lot of this debate comes down to what you think the function of the charts actually is though. if you think it's to highlight the most important maps, then legacy will be important in deciding how you vote. for me, i think the charts are good for showing people good maps and bringing maps to light that might not otherwise get attention, so i don't think a map being good for its time should impact that, especially when there are maps from the same time that are still good today
"immediately discarding any map made before 2017 because 'this map isnt groundbreaking nowadays' is 0iq"
1. i never mentioned maps being groundbreaking nowadays at all. tbh i think rating a map highly because it's groundbreaking is really stupid for the exact reason you mentioned, being that community perception of what is novel changes over time
2. there are absolutely maps that are still good from before 2017. how is this "discarding maps made before 2017". if anything, considering maps based on how much you like them absent from mapping context is putting them on an equal playing field to new maps, not discarding them
anhedonia if it lived up to the hype
@mismagius you rated o'er the flood a 4.5