log in

unusual audio

denied

Name unusual audio
Description Uses an audio track that is not an actual song.
Parent descriptor None
Usable True
Proposer Constantine
Type new
Creation date 2023-11-25 11:13:00
Last updated 2023-11-26 18:14:29
Proposals can be approved when it receives 20 votes and has >=65% positive votes. Approvals can only happen after a minimum of 5 days.
Status denied by moonpoint

Vote

0% voted positively


yes (0):
no (6): moonpoint, choke enough, Aragon, yukic, LowAccuracySS, App
hold (4): -Koish-, milr_, Leviathan, Boombox


Comments (19)
Comments are disabled for proposals with an outcome.

LowAccuracySS voted no
2yr ago

ok ya novelty genre works

2yr ago

sure

moonpoint voted no
2yr ago

yeah, i should add editing genre & lang now that graveyard stuff is a thing. "novelty" genre would potentially cover this then?

2yr ago

i mean for stuff thats already on the leaderboard yeah agree, hence why earlier i said its useless before graved sets are addable - also this was also meant to cover stuff thats not tagged as novelty on the main site (both my examples doesn't have novelty tag)

though if proposing for editing tags is easier to implement then i'm ok on just waiting for that to be implemented instead of having descriptors for these kind of stuff

choke enough voted no
2yr ago

> im ambivalent as to how useful this is but also inis style is a tag so maybe im overthinking it

iNiS style is a tag for an existing mapping style and is not represented in either the legacy identifications (genre and language) so it makes sense for it to be a descriptor

choke enough voted no
2yr ago

This proposal gets way less convincing even after the changes… feels like someone could just use the novelty language genre to look up charts of maps like these. Only thing is missing is the ability to propose map edits for genre and language which I suppose can be easily added in the future

2yr ago

reharmonized speech bits stuff doesn't count ideally since thats still kind of a song

2yr ago

thats it thx i'm overthinking it for no reason

also more examples:
/s/490101 /s/729089

LowAccuracySS voted no
2yr ago

okay awesome changed to a yes bc if the map exists in the listing anyway it ought 2 be properly tagged

LowAccuracySS voted no
2yr ago

im ambivalent as to how useful this is but also inis style is a tag so maybe im overthinking it
current description is a bit wordy and weird; i'd go w something like "Uses a non-song backing audio track."

2yr ago

hopefully this is good enough

moonpoint voted no
2yr ago

this is still nowhere near the standard i'd expect to see for proposals, take a look at the way current descriptor descriptions are formatted for reference

2yr ago

just used novelty because ranked use novelty tag for smth similar ish

2yr ago

idk a better name for this tbh suggest smth better i'll take anything

yukic voted no
2yr ago

this isn't really the definition of novelty though

2yr ago

also this would be a useless idea if graved maps indexing is not a thing imo but now you can put in graved maps soooo

2yr ago

did something

moonpoint voted no
2yr ago

good initiative but obviously needs way way better than this. i'd recommend drafting something more full before opening a proposal in the future

2yr ago

don't know how to describe this in a good and not bullshit way but it's for stuff like this wwwwwwwwwwwww - wwwwwwwwwwww (ID => 696435)

also not sure if parent tag should be meta information

labs | discord | github | rules | descriptors | edit queue
0.30345606803894s