large circles
approved| Name | large circles |
| Description | Uses larger-than-usual circles. Typically refers to maps with circle sizes 2 and below. |
| Parent descriptor | None |
| Usable | True |
| Proposer | a bat |
| Type | new |
| Creation date | 2026-04-02 01:05:08 |
| Last updated | 2026-06-29 21:35:09 |
| Proposals can be approved when it receives 20 votes and has >=65% positive votes. Approvals can only happen after a minimum of 5 days. | |
| Status | approved by moonpoint |
Vote
100% voted positivelyyes (24): a bat, maxb, Lilian, Happy Satoko, Izzeee, vyper, LowAccuracySS, wyit, Kaly, Woey, Mizunashi Akari, milr_, Garalulu, ayufly, moonpoint, crusire, doops, Evamare, Hobbes2, Deca, Erikillo, Papercraft, Cloudpaw, lifelessapple
no (0):
hold (0):
Comments (10)
Comments are disabled for proposals with an outcome.
Comments are disabled for proposals with an outcome.
Thanks for keeping the descriptors here, they are essential
I still want OMDB to have descriptors because I'm not pleased with how little the osu! team has done with them. We'll continue to do better here. This seems like a good descriptor
precision currently has "Typically refers to maps with circle sizes above and including 6." in its description so that should cover that side i think
cs 6 or higher
add a small circle one as well
uncomplicatedly good proposal
weren't the descriptors taken from omdb data initially?
I'd say there still is value in having the descriptor system here since among other reasons, it is constrained to osu!lazer ingame, and a considerable amount here are on stable, myself included.
It's a good descriptor, but I am still not sure the descriptor system should even stay here considering the game itself has descriptors now.
We have precision, so I don't think it would hurt to have the opposite side of the spectrum, considering there are a fair amount of large circle maps beyond low diffs.
Description probably could be refined