tag [tech]
approved| Name | tag [tech] |
| Short Description | A style of freeform slider tech that notably uses complex slider designs inspired by graffiti tags. |
| Long Description | |
| Parent descriptor | slider tech |
| Usable | True |
| Proposer | maxb |
| Type | new |
| Creation date | 2026-06-15 12:20:12 |
| Last updated | 2026-07-02 08:20:15 |
| Status | approved by moonpoint |
Vote
100% voted positivelyyes (16): maxb, chowch, [[[[[[, moonpoint, aesth, Regou, gibberjabber1, garvanturr, Rita Summers, a night parrot, espii, a bat, Erikillo, Visionary, Adequate, Leviathan
no (0):
hold (0):
Comments (14)
Comments are disabled for proposals with an outcome.
Comments are disabled for proposals with an outcome.
added!
I dont like 'slider tag' since it feels like inventing a new term. Unless thats already in use.
wub wub
Leave your responses
maybe call it slider tag since the Sliders resemble Tags what we think guys 🤔 ðŸ’
Similar opinion as aesth. Ugly-ass sliders, but really prominent in graveyarded tournament NM4s. Maybe this descriptor can be used to find maps that make them grow on me.
small edit: I added in 'notably' because I didnt want to give the impression that slidershape designs are the only thing that define the style
lets get some more votes my lil guys in my computer
i like the idea of this descriptor because i can avoid the maps
I wasnt really thinking of it as a scene in that sense. any map that uses the style should have the descriptor. I will change the parent to slider tech per moonpoint's suggestion
scenes like "aimslop" and "tag" that describe a specific style of mapping seem tricky to work with because it's hard to pin down when exactly the scene ends (assuming you want to use scene descriptors like rym does)
i don't think i would move it under "slider tech" though; the skillsets that tag maps test aren't fundamentally different from other hsv/complex sv maps, so maybe it should go under "slidershapes" or some other style instead
"tag [tech]" seems good to me. If this is merged then I'll rename the current "tag" one to "tag [playstyle]"
Would move this under "slider tech" though
the [tech] marker is too differentiate it from the existing tag descriptor (for tag4 maps). apollo has said using brackets like this is fine but im unsure if [tech] is the word that should be used in this case
examples:
/s/1177270
/s/1256524
tech style originating in ~2020 that uses a more freeform structure and distinctive complex and 'loose' bezier curve slider designs.
There aren't alot of scene descriptors like this one, but I feel this one is more easily definable than most other potential ones, so I think it would be a good descriptor to have.
The first map I linked says 'the original tag mapping' so that could be considered a source. I have seen the term used quite frequently but naturally this is mostly just random messages.