large circles
pending| Name | large circles |
| Description |
Uses larger-than-usual circles. Typically refers to maps with circle sizes below 3. (was: Uses larger-than-usual circles. Typically refers to maps with circle sizes 2 and below.) |
| Parent descriptor | aim |
| Usable | True |
| Proposer | a bat |
| Type | modify |
| Creation date | 2026-06-29 21:36:03 |
| Last updated | 2026-06-30 03:10:41 |
| Proposals can be approved when it receives 20 votes and has >=65% positive votes. Approvals can only happen after a minimum of 5 days. |
Vote
75% voted positivelyyes (6): a bat, moonpoint, piklopedia, Metal Wings, maxb, [[[[[[
no (0):
hold (2): chowch, squirrelpascals
Comments (6)
3 and below --> below 3.
means stuff at exactly cs3 would still be invalid under this description, but stuff like 2.5 would count.
i could agree with that
@squirrelpascals tbh that probably is what I'd prefer since I do think cs3 flat is a grey area, but I've been seeing a lot of cs3 maps be voted with the descriptor (and there are plans to automate this descriptor under the cs <= 3 idea https://github.com/apollo-dw/omdb/issues/106 )
i think if verbiage is changed to say "below three" then i'd say sure
3 is a little bit big but not big enough that its remarkable imo. Just like precision is considered cs6 and above
General consensus seems to be that large circles includes maps from 0 to 3. The description currently states circle sizes 2 and below, changing descriptions to 3 and below would better match with how the descriptor is being used atm