i didn't really think this map could ever be a 4 personally, but also i guess 02:52:527 (1) - if you thought this was leading up to anything rather than just silly density contrast section i guess it was way too unsubtle of a patterning choice
think it could easily be a 4 map but im so sad that the map doesn't 03:02:373 (1) - utilize this concept 03:12:220 - here because i felt that the build-up from the 3:02 section was leading up to something but it never rly did
have to admit that ignoring 3/4 sliders is a really good thing, wish i was thinking the same way 2 years ago
yorushika circle spam abuser, someone needs to stop this guy
circular flow jump spam = win
i didn't really think this map could ever be a 4 personally, but also i guess 02:52:527 (1) - if you thought this was leading up to anything rather than just silly density contrast section i guess it was way too unsubtle of a patterning choice
actually its 2,5 and not 2
think it could easily be a 4 map but im so sad that the map doesn't 03:02:373 (1) - utilize this concept 03:12:220 - here because i felt that the build-up from the 3:02 section was leading up to something but it never rly did
03:22:373 - ahhhhhhhh this break
03:53:143 - this devalues like the entire maps emphasis so none of the stuff b4 matters also it puts these 04:10:066 - into a bad place